[chuck-users] Installing on OSX 10.5.4

Joel Matthys jwmatthys at gmail.com
Tue Aug 5 18:44:07 EDT 2014


I will say that I built ChucK without problems on PPC Linux, so if 
you're able to build it from sources, the PPC architecture *probably* 
won't prevent compilation, but then I don't know about Mac.

PPC OSX is a lonely planet these days.

Joel

On 08/05/2014 05:37 PM, Spencer Salazar wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Welcome to Chuck! We currently do not provide executables for PowerPC 
> architecture, and don't actively test/support it in the source 
> releases either. Though it looks like this isn't clearly stated 
> anywhere in the installer or website. If you have access to a newer 
> Intel-based Mac available with Mac OS 10.5 or later, that should work 
> just fine.
>
> spencer
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Tom Charles-Edwards 
> <tomcharles-edwards at fsmail.net <mailto:tomcharles-edwards at fsmail.net>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hello Joel,
>
>     thanks for the fast reply. Yes, it's a PPC machine. Error message
>     to do with the installer not being able to write files to /
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     Tom
>
>
>     > Message Received: Aug 05 2014, 11:23 PM
>     > From: "Joel Matthys" <jwmatthys at gmail.com
>     <mailto:jwmatthys at gmail.com>>
>     > To: chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>     <mailto:chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
>     > Cc:
>     > Subject: Re: [chuck-users] Installing on OSX 10.5.4
>     >
>     > Hi Tom. Welcome!
>     >
>     > What kind of error message did you receive when you tried to run the
>     > version from the website?
>     >
>     > Also, just checking, you're not by any chance using a PPC G5?
>     >
>     > Joel
>     >
>     > On 08/05/2014 05:16 PM, Tom Charles-Edwards wrote:
>     > > Hello,
>     > >
>     > > first post here. Looking forward to learning ChucK. :) I have
>     a G5 running OSX 10.5.4. The current version of ChucK is
>     apparently good for 10.5 and later. Tried that - didn't work. I
>     see
>     > > all the older versions on a separate page. Which one should I try?
>     > >
>     > > Thanks for any help,
>     > >
>     > > Tom
>     > > _______________________________________________
>     > > chuck-users mailing list
>     > > chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>     <mailto:chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
>     > > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > chuck-users mailing list
>     > chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>     <mailto:chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
>     > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     chuck-users mailing list
>     chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>     <mailto:chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
>     https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20140805/407e4392/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the chuck-users mailing list