[chuck-users] confused about time/control
Julien Saint-Martin
julien.saintmartin at googlemail.com
Thu Oct 23 08:21:56 EDT 2014
Hi Peter,
You should try Jack2 instead of Jack.
I am not sure it will solve your mutex problem but it is more safe when
using ChucK and it will certainly reduce the number of Xrun you have.
Cheers,
Julien
On 23/10/2014 03:59, Peter Lutek wrote:
> On 2014-10-22 13:12, Moisés Gabriel Cachay Tello wrote:
>> In order to advance 'now' and make it eventually equal or higher than
>> 'later' you should put inside your loop something like:
>>
>> now + 5::second => time later;
>> while(now < later) {
>> ...
>> 1::second => now;
>> }
>
> ok, so now it works sometimes, but other times ChucK crashes, with
> this error:
> chuck: pthread_mutex_lock.c:62: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion
> `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.
>
> any clues?
>
> here's the code, as it stands:
>
> /////////
>
> // set up MIDI
> MidiIn min;
> MidiOut mout;
> MidiMsg msgin;
> MidiMsg msgout;
>
> // connect to port 1 and print result
> <<<"","">>>;
> <<<"MIDI-in then MIDI-out:","">>>;
> <<< min.open(1),"" >>>;
> <<< mout.open(1),"" >>>;
> <<<"","">>>;
>
> dur beat;
>
> now + 30::second => time later;
> while( now < later ){
> if( min.recv(msgin) ){
> ( msgin.data3 + 10 ) * 50::ms => beat;
> <<<beat>>>;
> }
> 50::ms => now;
> }
> <<<"done">>>;
>
> //////////
>
> thanks for any help... cheers!
> .pltk.
>
>
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list