for me only VSTi is important, but i guess LADSPA is easier to implement than VST. Ari Lazier wrote: > which of those would be most important? In its current state, chuck > could most likely support vst(i). Don't know anything about audio units > or ladspa. > > > On Aug 6, 2004, at 8:02 AM, smoerk wrote: > >> - VST(i), AudioUnits and LADSPA support >> >> - interactive shell