[ixp1200] compiler optimizations--instruction address problem

[Vijay Ramamurthi]

Hi Shweta,
The code that you have pasted here looks like a
bunch of function calls and type casts rite?
Take a look at the assembly code, and try to see what is going on,
it might be executing these statements. Even though you
have turned the compiler optimization off, if I not wrong
the compiler will perform basic optimzations that is expected of 
any compiler.

Hope this helps

Vijay Ram

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Shweta Rao wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> When i run my code in simulation debug mode on the workbench ,i have
> set it to display the instruction addresses and  in the project
> settings i have set compiler options for optimization to none. Inspite
> of that there are two instruction  where the instruction addresses
> does not show up and the simulator does not execute them.Is it because
> of the code or the project settings. The instructions are
> 
> buf_handle = receive_packet(0, 5, &cur_pkt_len);
> 		//buf_data_ptr = (__declspec(sdram) long long
> *)(buffer_get_data_ptr(buf_handle));
> 	buf_data_ptr = (__declspec(sdram) void *)
> 			               (((unsigned int)buffer_get_data_ptr(buf_handle)) + 3);
> 
> 
> If anyone is aware of the solution,please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> shweta
> _______________________________________________
> ixp1200 mailing list
> ixp1200 at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/ixp1200
>