[parsec-users] Any more pipelined benchmark?

Qingyuan Deng ddqqyy at gmail.com
Tue Sep 23 21:06:36 EDT 2008


Hi Chris,

Could you point me which specific commercial workloads implemented by
pipeline? And do you plan add more such "irregular" parallel applications
into Parsec 2.0? I think it should be interesting to distingush Parsec from
SPLASH2 by adding more such applications...

Thanks,
Qingyuan

2008/9/23 Christian Bienia <cbienia at cs.princeton.edu>

>  Hi Qingyuan,
>
>
>
> Some of the commercial workloads out there should have pipelining. But to
> the best of my knowledge there's no suite of commercial workloads that's
> publicly available, only individual programs. People have done studies with
> self-assembled selections of workloads which they got from all kinds of
> sources (SPEC, for example).
>
>
>
> If somebody knows more I'd love to hear about it.
>
>
>
> - Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* parsec-users-bounces at lists.cs.princeton.edu [mailto:
> parsec-users-bounces at lists.cs.princeton.edu] *On Behalf Of *Qingyuan Deng
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:40 PM
> *To:* PARSEC Users
> *Subject:* [parsec-users] Any more pipelined benchmark?
>
>
>
> Hello guys,
>
> Anyone be aware of other "pipelined" parallel benchmark or programs other
> than those in Parsec1.0? Since I am looking for more "irregular" parallel
> benchmarks, any parallel benchmark other than "main-worker threads" patterns
> should be OK.
>
> Sincerely,
> Qingyuan
>
> _______________________________________________
> parsec-users mailing list
> parsec-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/parsec-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/parsec-users/attachments/20080923/7015ca5c/attachment.htm>


More information about the parsec-users mailing list