I want to encourage their development as well.
ChucK has something that no other environment has, the ability to jump from
one level to another without time constraints of architecture. Which I find
very interesting.
Regards
Lucas
2010/5/5 Ge Wang
Greetings Thomas!
Thanks for the encouraging feedback! ChucK is definitely alive, kicking, crashing, and growing! We need to restructure our dev process to be better, but we are as committed as ever.
Keep on ChucKin'!
Ge!
~~~ Ge Wang Assistant Professor Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) Stanford University http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~ge/ ~ Co-founder, CTO, Chief Creative Officer Smule http://www.smule.com/ | http://twitter.com/gewang ~~~
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Thomas Girod wrote:
Hi there.
I'm currently making a small app using ChucK, and I find this language marvelous - truly, I find it much easier to get things done with ChucK than with SuperCollider.
But at the same time, it's pretty obvious that the language still have a few caveats, stuff that is not implemented yet. Looking at the dev list, I can see there isn't much activity around this project anymore.
So, is the project dying ?
T
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users