Re: [chuck-users] is there a way of doing "callbacks" ( i.e. passing function as argument to be called later ) ?

8 Jun 2012

      I'll need a bit of time to figure out and do some tests on this tricks. I
still very kiddo on chuck, for instance i don't know what "<<" does.

Anyway i liked the Constructor workaround, and as soon as i get back to
chuck will see also how possible is to mess the source as well.

thanks for the energy on this subject

cya

On 24 May 2012 18:39, mike clemow  wrote:
...
Hi All,
Henrique, I highly encourage you to take a deep look at Michael Heuer's
LiCK library.  There are some great things in there that take advantage of
a functional paradigm in a generally functional-unfriendly language.
And while we're talking about functional style and other nerdery, I submit
for your consideration my attempt to implement a Closure in Chuck to avoid
overmuch global state.  This should appeal to you JavaScript geeks out
there as well.  It's influenced by ideas in LiCK.  And while it's a bit
harder to read than your traditional Chuckian style, it's the most
bang-for-buck (in terms of lines of code) I could get out of Chuck in a
short session.
Comments most welcome.
Enjoy!
-Mike
http://michaelclemow.com
http://semiotech.org
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Robert Poor  wrote:
...
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Michael Heuer  wrote:
...
You might be able to hack [eval] by writing to a temp file and
Machine.add'ing it.
That is sooo deliciously nasty, and I don't see why it couldn't work.
I wish I'd thought of it.
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

Re: [chuck-users] is there a way of doing "callbacks" ( i.e. passing function as argument to be called later ) ?

henrique matias