http://github.com/heuermh/lick/tree
I am pretty new to git so please let me know if I f'd anything up.
michael
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:00 PM, mike clemow
This is great!
Chuck Lib Lib Chuck Lib chUCK LICK LUCK CKlib
I think we should use git/github.
We could call it NORRIS...
-mike
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Rogan Carr
wrote: I also thought a tamer name would be Lib chUCK or LUCK. Depends on what vibe we want to send :)
Rogan
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael Heuer
wrote: Nice, that is available at all the hosting sites. Not sure I would try lick.com or lick.org from work though. :)
michael
Rogan Carr
wrote: Hmm. Lib ChucK => LiCK?
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Michael Heuer
wrote: I would also love to get my code off my box and out where others can use (and improve!) it. Git is fine with me. I have accounts on github and gitorious . . . we would just need a decent project name.
michael
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Rogan Carr
wrote: I'd be happy to contribute. I have tons of libraries that I use. What if we made a CVS-like repository like we're doing for the chuck source code? I think it's git? (I haven't set it up yet.)
Rogan
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, mike clemow
wrote: > Hey all, > > I just posted some very primitive (pun intended) Iterator classes for > arrays of Ints and Floats. > (http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/Chuck/Lib) I find them useful > in certain situations. (I think Michael Heuer has some superior > ArrayList / Iterator code somewhere.) > > Now, I'm well aware that most of you have personal class libraries > that you use to do your thing with Chuck (I do too). There are also > collections of code out there focusing on specific domains (SMELT, > etc). I wonder about all this code and whether or not there might be > some willingness to curate (for lack of better word) a collection of > library-like code that we might post somewhere--in some package that > isn't code posted on a wiki. > > It's not really a class library... it's not really package... it's > more like a distribution. But I think that it would be really helpful > and fun. There's something about posting code to the wiki that really > makes me cringe. Documentation of code is really what wiki's are good > for. I think that a downloadable collection with wiki documentation > would be ideal. I know that this couldn't be any sort of rigorously > designed library, but we could all incrementally contribute to > something like this, which I think would be really sweet. > > Is anyone into this idea? I'd be glad to set up the chuck/lib page on > the wiki to this end and organize, if people are into it. > > -Mike > > -- > http://michaelclemow.com > http://semiotech.org > _______________________________________________ > chuck-users mailing list > chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users > _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
-- http://michaelclemow.com http://semiotech.org _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users