Re: [chuck-users] class abuse

On 30 Sep 2009, at 17:33, Kassen wrote:

it would probably be preferable if the default would be the least general case (so taking Sitar before STKInstrument, before UGen, before Object).

I'll change your "probably be" to "": it WOULD be preferable to call the most specific version of an overloaded function. ChucK's class system has single, straight-line inheritance, so the "most specific" is always well defined. The current scheme -- using the (lexically) first function definition -- seems fraught with astonishment. Thanks for digging into this. - Rob