Re: [chuck-users] setting static data at construction (bug)

Just checking to see that I understand this. So these two pieces of code should result in different behaviour (not sure if you can reference static variables in classes like this, but you get my drift): class DaClazz { 8 => static int daVariable; } 9 => DaClass.daVariable; DaClazz objektz[7]; ------------------ class DaClazz { static int daVariable; 8 => daVariable; } 9 => DaClass.daVariable; DaClazz objektz[7]; After the first has executed daVariable = 9. After the second has executed daVariable = 8. ...? /Stefan On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Sinclair wrote:

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Kassen wrote:

...

Stephen Sinclair;

...

Hey, just wanted to mention: i encourage you (chuckers? chuckists? chuckians?) to post bugs here or on the dev list, even if you get little response. At some point in the future we can do a simple search through the lists for the keyword "bug" and collect them all, so please don't be afraid to make these kind of posts.

I took that to mean you agree this is a bug and not a feature?

Initializing static data is pretty useful, so if there's no other way to do it then yes I'd agree. Well, you can do it I guess by sticking initialization code after the class, but I think your proposal is cleaner.

Steve _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!