I just wanted to bump this and offer my small and humble opinion;
To me it's a sort of utopia to have this amount of open-ness about the
process of ChucK's development. It's therefore quite odd to me that there
isn't more debate on the sugested features and that only a very small group
of people has added desirered features and there is hardly any discussion at
all about which ideas are good and which ones are silly/redundant/dangerous.
Why isn't there more debate?
Kas.
On 8/8/07, Ge Wang
Greetings!
We are nearing the next very sporktacular release of ChucK and want to coordinate with you on organizing and prioritizing some bug fixes/ features/updates. We've been scouring through the forums, wiki pages, and posts and collected much good info. Thanks to all who have been kind and patient enough to enter requests, reports, and suggestions into the various pages. At this stage, we'd like to get your input on prioritizing them for the new release (in about 2 weeks). For this purpose, we've created two new wiki pages for feature requests/reports and bug reports/requests from here:
http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Bugs http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Features
Please enter full descriptions and concise accompanying code when helpful. While we can't guarantee that these would make it into the immediate next version, they are very helpful in getting a sense of disaster zones that needs more urgent attention, and is a chance to tidy up the information. If you don't want to deal with the wiki directly, feel free to post here or to chuck-dev, and our uh wiki specialists will transfer the text there.
As for the manual, let's keep going here:
http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Manual
Thank you very much! Let us know if you have any questions.
Keep on ChucKin'
Best, chuck team _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users