Re: [chuck-users] feature ideas

Or ChucK could drop these data type shenanigans entirely. Really, who's benefiting?

Well, I didn't want to come right out and say it, but dynamic typing seemed like a no-brainer for a livecoding language. -mike On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lieber wrote:

On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Kassen wrote:

...

I think this is to prevent worse issues. If you'd change your class's member-function return types that would lead to serious issues with other code that was already compiled using those. I think this matter is affected by many (if not all?)of the issues affecting the updating of running code.

Or ChucK could drop these data type shenanigans entirely. Really, who's benefiting?

Also, my small hacking skills, yada-yada. :)

-- Tom Lieber http://AllTom.com/ _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- http://semiotech.org http://deadlylittlepills.com/michael