Re: [chuck-users] "Or"

How about likely(n) ... where 0 <= n <= 1.0, which will return true with a probability of n. Even better, just make n an optional arg to maybe(). Sent from my iPhone On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Kassen wrote:

2010/9/3 Rebecca Fiebrink OR, because it's chuck and therefore more fun than your average language:

Ok, that's it.

Let's have "probably" and "perhaps" at 75% and 25% as well. Everyone loves "maybe" so much, we might as well have more of it.

Does English have single words describing indeterminate times and/or durations that aren't already reserved or would be confusing? We talk about "in a bit" or "in a while" but those sound like they would be cause for confusion. "soon" might be a good one?

Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users