Hmm. Lib ChucK => LiCK? On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:

I would also love to get my code off my box and out where others can use (and improve!) it. Git is fine with me. I have accounts on github and gitorious . . . we would just need a decent project name.

michael

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Rogan Carr wrote:

...

I'd be happy to contribute. I have tons of libraries that I use. What if we made a CVS-like repository like we're doing for the chuck source code? I think it's git? (I haven't set it up yet.)

Rogan

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, mike clemow wrote:

...

Hey all,

I just posted some very primitive (pun intended) Iterator classes for arrays of Ints and Floats. (http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/Chuck/Lib) I find them useful in certain situations. (I think Michael Heuer has some superior ArrayList / Iterator code somewhere.)

Now, I'm well aware that most of you have personal class libraries that you use to do your thing with Chuck (I do too). There are also collections of code out there focusing on specific domains (SMELT, etc). I wonder about all this code and whether or not there might be some willingness to curate (for lack of better word) a collection of library-like code that we might post somewhere--in some package that isn't code posted on a wiki.

It's not really a class library... it's not really package... it's more like a distribution. But I think that it would be really helpful and fun. There's something about posting code to the wiki that really makes me cringe. Documentation of code is really what wiki's are good for. I think that a downloadable collection with wiki documentation would be ideal. I know that this couldn't be any sort of rigorously designed library, but we could all incrementally contribute to something like this, which I think would be really sweet.

Is anyone into this idea? I'd be glad to set up the chuck/lib page on the wiki to this end and organize, if people are into it.

-Mike

-- http://michaelclemow.com http://semiotech.org _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

I also thought a tamer name would be Lib chUCK or LUCK. Depends on what vibe we want to send :) Rogan On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:

Nice, that is available at all the hosting sites. Not sure I would try lick.com or lick.org from work though. :)

michael

Rogan Carr wrote:

...

Hmm. Lib ChucK => LiCK?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:

...

I would also love to get my code off my box and out where others can use (and improve!) it. Git is fine with me. I have accounts on github and gitorious . . . we would just need a decent project name.

michael

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Rogan Carr wrote:

...

I'd be happy to contribute. I have tons of libraries that I use. What if we made a CVS-like repository like we're doing for the chuck source code? I think it's git? (I haven't set it up yet.)

Rogan

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, mike clemow wrote:

...

Hey all,

I just posted some very primitive (pun intended) Iterator classes for arrays of Ints and Floats. (http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/Chuck/Lib) I find them useful in certain situations. (I think Michael Heuer has some superior ArrayList / Iterator code somewhere.)

Now, I'm well aware that most of you have personal class libraries that you use to do your thing with Chuck (I do too). There are also collections of code out there focusing on specific domains (SMELT, etc). I wonder about all this code and whether or not there might be some willingness to curate (for lack of better word) a collection of library-like code that we might post somewhere--in some package that isn't code posted on a wiki.

It's not really a class library... it's not really package... it's more like a distribution. But I think that it would be really helpful and fun. There's something about posting code to the wiki that really makes me cringe. Documentation of code is really what wiki's are good for. I think that a downloadable collection with wiki documentation would be ideal. I know that this couldn't be any sort of rigorously designed library, but we could all incrementally contribute to something like this, which I think would be really sweet.

Is anyone into this idea? I'd be glad to set up the chuck/lib page on the wiki to this end and organize, if people are into it.

-Mike

-- http://michaelclemow.com http://semiotech.org _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

http://github.com/heuermh/lick/tree I am pretty new to git so please let me know if I f'd anything up. michael On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:00 PM, mike clemow wrote:

This is great!

Chuck Lib Lib Chuck Lib chUCK LICK LUCK CKlib

I think we should use git/github.

We could call it NORRIS...

-mike

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Rogan Carr wrote:

...

I also thought a tamer name would be Lib chUCK or LUCK. Depends on what vibe we want to send :)

Rogan

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:

...

Nice, that is available at all the hosting sites. Not sure I would try lick.com or lick.org from work though. :)

michael

Rogan Carr wrote:

...

Hmm. Lib ChucK => LiCK?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:

...

I would also love to get my code off my box and out where others can use (and improve!) it. Git is fine with me. I have accounts on github and gitorious . . . we would just need a decent project name.

michael

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Rogan Carr wrote:

...

I'd be happy to contribute. I have tons of libraries that I use. What if we made a CVS-like repository like we're doing for the chuck source code? I think it's git? (I haven't set it up yet.)

Rogan

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, mike clemow wrote: > Hey all, > > I just posted some very primitive (pun intended) Iterator classes for > arrays of Ints and Floats. > (http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/Chuck/Lib) I find them useful > in certain situations. (I think Michael Heuer has some superior > ArrayList / Iterator code somewhere.) > > Now, I'm well aware that most of you have personal class libraries > that you use to do your thing with Chuck (I do too). There are also > collections of code out there focusing on specific domains (SMELT, > etc). I wonder about all this code and whether or not there might be > some willingness to curate (for lack of better word) a collection of > library-like code that we might post somewhere--in some package that > isn't code posted on a wiki. > > It's not really a class library... it's not really package... it's > more like a distribution. But I think that it would be really helpful > and fun. There's something about posting code to the wiki that really > makes me cringe. Documentation of code is really what wiki's are good > for. I think that a downloadable collection with wiki documentation > would be ideal. I know that this couldn't be any sort of rigorously > designed library, but we could all incrementally contribute to > something like this, which I think would be really sweet. > > Is anyone into this idea? I'd be glad to set up the chuck/lib page on > the wiki to this end and organize, if people are into it. > > -Mike > > -- > http://michaelclemow.com > http://semiotech.org > _______________________________________________ > chuck-users mailing list > chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users > _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- http://michaelclemow.com http://semiotech.org _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

Chuck Wagon. ;-) On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Michael Heuer wrote: ...

I am pretty new to git so please let me know if I f'd anything up.

I'm new too. We'll figure it out. On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Scott Wheeler wrote: ... I've also got a handful of things here in various states if

anyone cares to mix them in.

I'll definitely take a look at them. I'll go through my stuff as well, although I'm not sure how much there is yet. I'm not sure I fully understand some of the functional stuff in your code, Michael, but I'm excited to take a look at it. I'll post my stuff tomorrow. -Mike