[chuck-users] user study!!!
mike clemow
gelfmuse at gmail.com
Sun Jun 11 15:39:36 EDT 2006
Hello,
> Also; I want a ChucK shirt too.
> Can we have official ChucK shirts that say something along the lines
> of "realtime isn't fast enough" or should one go to a copy-shop?
I second this. I think this should top-priority. Also, I think that
the tee-shirt should feature Graham's sonicboomchuck image on the
front (see below). ;-)
> (functional language frontend for ChucK)
> http://atlhack.org/images/sonicboomchuck.png
All joking aside, this is seriously important:
> > sketchiness:
> > Also, I find that the chuck-Audicle revision model seems to
> > fulfill a searched-out quantity I prize in creative tools:
> > for lack of a better term I'll call it sketchiness
> > (besides the poor collision with the term meaning low quality
> > or suspect).
>
> This is cool, you are on to something here.
This means that the Chuck team has taken something powerful but
terribly abstract (live-coding, audio programming) and made it feel
TACTILE, a quality that most computer-music tools do not exhibit.
This is a tremendous achievement. Performers rejoice! I want to see
Chuck small and fast. I want to see embedded Chuck in small devices.
ChuckNet. Ubiquitous Chucking. The ChuckPod. I want to Chuck as I'm
walking down the street.
It's just a matter of time => now.
This is an inspiring tool and an inspiring community. Thanks, everyone!
-Michael
On 6/11/06, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
> Graham Coleman;
>
>
> > sketchiness:
> > Also, I find that the chuck-Audicle revision model seems to
> > fulfill a searched-out quantity I prize in creative tools:
> > for lack of a better term I'll call it sketchiness
> > (besides the poor collision with the term meaning low quality
> > or suspect).
>
> This is cool, you are on to something here.
>
> I don't think there is that bad a collision; I think my friends are
> like yours and mine keep dummies. The idea seems to be that dummies
> are somewhat private, nobody will see it so it doesn't matter what you
> put in. With "scetching" as I understand it the absense of quality
> controll is a great catalyst. Something similar is going on in ChucK,
> even now that it's somewhat stable-ish and mostly documented-like. We
> need more of that.
>
> Also; I want a ChucK shirt too.
> Can we have official ChucK shirts that say something along the lines
> of "realtime isn't fast enough" or should one go to a copy-shop?
>
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
--
"ooh aah bleep"
-miraton
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list