[chuck-users] current bug summary (partial, obviously)
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Wed Jun 28 07:30:53 EDT 2006
On 6/28/06, Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> This reminds me: what's the CVS policy (not asking for guarentees!)?
> Would it make sense at all (for me) to grab from cvs and actually expect
> to 1) compile it 2) use it 3) trust it (probably not)?
Would the "snapshot" one be a compromise?
I have that one because it fixed a issue I had with functions that
took a array, manipulated it then crashed the VM.
That one seems dependable to me at least; I didn't see it crash in a
way that wasn't clearly my own fault yet.
More information about the chuck-users