[chuck-users] VIM users
operagasten at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 07:51:09 EDT 2007
tor 2007-11-01 klockan 12:40 +0100 skrev eduard aylon:
> >> I think other vim users should say something about this. In my
> >> opinion if you get use to and like a specific syntax coloring it is
> >> difficult to be comfortable again with a different one. So if yours
> >> was the one on the wiki, probably many others are using it. If I had
> >> known (it's my fault for not checking it) that someone was updating
> >> it, I would have worked on that. So I think we should wait for others
> >> to speak out.
> > True, true, but I seriously doubt that there is any more vim users on
> > the list (well, not more than 3, anyway).
> Really? well, then many don't know what they are missing :-)
Well, it -at least- seems like most people use miniAudicle. I don't even
think there are many people using Emacs.
> >>> I'm attaching a new version of the one you sent in your first post,
> >>> but
> >>> with added support for the new "<--"-comments (line 126 and 129),
> >> didn't know you can use <-- to write comments.
> > It's pretty new (as of 184.108.40.206).
> Oh, yes. I see that now in the VERSION file.
> > Okay, we seems to have pretty different views on how it should look. I
> > propose that we keep both files on the wiki - it would be a shame
> > if any
> > of them were lost. I'll update mine with the things I like in your
> > ck.vim, and you can do what you want with yours
> ok, then.
This is probably better than arguing about how the highlighting should
More information about the chuck-users