[chuck-users] VIM users

[Mark Pauley]

Don't make me write chuck-el.


_Mark

On Nov 1, 2007, at 4:51 AM, Martin Ahnelöv wrote:

> tor 2007-11-01 klockan 12:40 +0100 skrev eduard aylon:
>>>>
>>>> I think other vim users should say something about this. In my
>>>> opinion if you get use  to and like a specific syntax coloring it  
>>>> is
>>>> difficult to be comfortable again with a different one. So if yours
>>>> was the one on the wiki, probably many others are using it. If I  
>>>> had
>>>> known (it's my fault for not checking it) that someone was updating
>>>> it, I would have worked on that. So I think we should wait for  
>>>> others
>>>> to speak out.
>>>
>>> True, true, but I seriously doubt that there is any more vim users  
>>> on
>>> the list (well, not more than 3, anyway).
>>
>> Really? well, then many don't know what they are missing :-)
>>
>
> Well, it -at least- seems like most people use miniAudicle. I don't  
> even
> think there are many people using Emacs.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm attaching a new version of the one you sent in your first  
>>>>> post,
>>>>> but
>>>>> with added support for the new "<--"-comments (line 126 and 129),
>>>>
>>>> didn't know you can use <-- to write comments.
>>>
>>> It's pretty new (as of 1.2.1.0).
>>
>>
>> Oh, yes. I see that now in the VERSION file.
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Okay, we seems to have pretty different views on how it should  
>>> look. I
>>> propose that we keep both files on the wiki - it would be a shame
>>> if any
>>> of them were lost. I'll update mine with the things I like in your
>>> ck.vim, and you can do what you want with yours
>>
>> ok, then.
>>
>
> This is probably better than arguing about how the highlighting should
> work.
>
> Gasten
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users