[chuck-users] ChucK linux requirements issue

Martin Ahnelöv operagasten at gmail.com
Thu May 22 03:02:10 EDT 2008


I'm thinking about getting a macbook, but all new is 64 bit... I also
wants to move to 64 bit on my desktop, since a bunch of my apps will
work better there - but without chuck...

ons 2008-05-21 klockan 11:55 -0700 skrev kevin:
> I'm sure a 64-bit compatible ChucK would expand the linux user base by
> quite a bit. I met someone this past weekend who doesn't use ChucK for
> the sole reason that it doesn't run on his 64-bit machine.
> 
> Consider this 1.5 more votes for a 64-bit version?
> 
> Best,
> Kevin
> 
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:59 AM, mike clemow <gelfmuse at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>         That is unfortunate.  I use chuck on 64studio (the 32bit
>         version) and
>         it's actually quite stable and quite fast on that optimized
>         kernel
>         that Free has built.  I imagine a 64bit chuck would be nothing
>         short
>         of amazing.
>         
>         -mike
>         
>         
>         On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Oliver Oli <oliver.oli
>         +0815 at gmail.com> wrote:
>         > this is really sad news for me. i just tried to compile
>         chuck on 64studio.
>         >
>         > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Kassen
>         <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
>         >> Dear list (and devs/ admins),
>         >>
>         >> The ChucK download page
>         ( http://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/release/ ) doesn't
>         >> mention that on Linux ChucK requires a 32 bit system (and
>         not 64, right
>         >> now).
>         >>
>         >> I strongly suspect this to be the cause of
>         confusion/segfaulting here;
>         >> http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26414
>         >>
>         >> (though I may be wrong)
>         >>
>         >> I would recommend putting this "on the packaging" so we can
>         go on to new and
>         >> innovative ways of seg-faulting and being confused.
>         >>
>         >> In case I'm wrong; do we have a Fedora-expert who might be
>         able to help
>         >> Flies there?
>         >>
>         >> Yours,
>         >> Kas.
>         >>
>         >> _______________________________________________
>         >> chuck-users mailing list
>         >> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>         >> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>         >>
>         >>
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > chuck-users mailing list
>         > chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>         > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>         >
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         --
>         http://semiotech.org
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         chuck-users mailing list
>         chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>         https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>         
> 
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users



More information about the chuck-users mailing list