[chuck-users] Killing thread from without
Kassen
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Tue Apr 21 15:32:16 EDT 2009
2009/4/21 Hans Aberg <haberg at math.su.se>
> Is it possible to kill a thread by saving a reference and calling exit()
> (or something) on that reference? Are there any means by which a created
> thread can be manipulated from without it by its reference?
Like this?
fun void foo()
{
while(1)
{
<<<"beep">>>;
second => now;
}
}
spork ~foo() @=> Shred bar;
3::second => now;
bar.exit();
second => now;
<<<"bye">>>;
Sadly there is currently a bug when we define a Shred object and later
assign a actual shred to it; this will crash ChucK. This bug was likely
caused by the last update which attempted to clean up the relationship
between Shred objects and actual running processes (this wasn't always a
very clear relationship).
You can also have the Shred report it's number using me.id() inside that
shred and set Machine.remove(int id ) loose on that.
If this crashing bug bothers you (and it likely will) you can use this
construct to get a shred's id number while sporking it;
<<<(spork ~foo()).id()>>>;
This integer can then be used with Machine.remove() to remove the shred.
There are more illustrations in /examples/shred/
I think that should get you out of trouble? I can't recommend the /examples/
directory highly enough as a resource.
Yours,
Kas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20090421/93fbe8a3/attachment.htm>
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list