[chuck-users] Let's pick up the tweet-length gauntlet!

[Kassen]

John;


> good- in the interest of avoiding problems, it might be good to put an
> explicit version number, or a number that the version has to be
> greater than.
>
> 1.2.1.3 is the current one. Seems a easy choice for me?


> > Errors/warnings and eventual crashes seem perfectly fine to me.
>
> the only thing i'd suggest is that the entry is posted to this mailing
> list sometime before a certain date [or maybe 'tweeted' to a certain
> account] ...
>
>
I'm not sure to what degree Twitter tags like "#chuckage" or "@John" would
go at the expense of characters or how sc dealt with that.


> and i don't know about web space or whatever. if you wanted to make
> this a join chuck/microsound project [and everyone was on board] we
> might be able to host it on the microsound site [which is all set up
> already]. i'm not saying this is a particularly good or bad idea, but
> just offering it as a possibility.
>
>
We have web-space at the forum at the EM site. EM has servers for files that
are on a very big connection in Norway. Princeton and Stanford also have
webspace that we might be able to use. I don't think any of those would even
blink at the kind of space and bandwith this is likely to take.


> there will be some work involved with gathering up the entries, and
> putting them on the web, but that's later.
>
>
Indeed. There may be questions there, like to what degree a flash-based
player is suitable to present the output of a FOSS project and what
alternatives there are. As this would be great advertising for ChucK I think
we should consider both a convenient pre-rendered format as well as easy
access to the sources.



again, i think this is a great idea- nice work!!
>
> I hardly did a thing, really. It's good to see so much enthousiasm already.

Kas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20091027/22ca3874/attachment-0001.html>