[chuck-users] Information request
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 07:48:48 EDT 2011
I work as a developer
> for noise related applications (in particular we manage aircraft noise
> and in general noise pollution).
> 1. Do you think that ChucK could be a profitable choice to have this
> job done?
Let me get this straight; you would like to analyse a signal for things like
amplitude, RMS power and spectral distribution, possibly compensating for
the sensitivity of hearing so you can determine whether you need
sound-proofing and if so of what kind?
If so then yes; I would say that could be done. One big issue for
applications like yours, where there will be regulations, will be
calibrating the whole system (mic, pre-amp, analysis, analysis display) but
that is a issue that is quite universal in that field.
I think ChucK would be a better choice for this than PD, I'm not sure how it
would compare to Faust.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users