[chuck-users] chuck vs supercollider?
Atte André Jensen
atte at email.dk
Sun Aug 12 04:28:14 EDT 2012
On 2012-08-12 01:25, ronni montoya wrote:
> Hi, Is this way of making sounds very expensive in cpu terms? :O
Hi. Let me warn you up-front: chuck is a very expensive language. I was
forced to come up with another way of generating sound, but I should
mention that my setup was quite elaborate.
I seem to remember Ge saying something like "first we make it work,
*then* we make it fast", however development of chuck stopped before the
last part was started :-(
I did some non-scientific profiling on various chuck ugens, which could
give you an idea about which ugens are the most expensive:
Don't get me wrong, I love chuck for what it is!
More information about the chuck-users