That is unfortunate. I use chuck on 64studio (the 32bit version) and it's actually quite stable and quite fast on that optimized kernel that Free has built. I imagine a 64bit chuck would be nothing short of amazing. -mike On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Oliver Oli wrote:

this is really sad news for me. i just tried to compile chuck on 64studio.

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Kassen wrote:

...

Dear list (and devs/ admins),

The ChucK download page ( http://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/release/ ) doesn't mention that on Linux ChucK requires a 32 bit system (and not 64, right now).

I strongly suspect this to be the cause of confusion/segfaulting here; http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26414

(though I may be wrong)

I would recommend putting this "on the packaging" so we can go on to new and innovative ways of seg-faulting and being confused.

In case I'm wrong; do we have a Fedora-expert who might be able to help Flies there?

Yours, Kas.

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- http://semiotech.org

I'm thinking about getting a macbook, but all new is 64 bit... I also wants to move to 64 bit on my desktop, since a bunch of my apps will work better there - but without chuck... ons 2008-05-21 klockan 11:55 -0700 skrev kevin:

I'm sure a 64-bit compatible ChucK would expand the linux user base by quite a bit. I met someone this past weekend who doesn't use ChucK for the sole reason that it doesn't run on his 64-bit machine.

Consider this 1.5 more votes for a 64-bit version?

Best, Kevin

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:59 AM, mike clemow wrote: That is unfortunate. I use chuck on 64studio (the 32bit version) and it's actually quite stable and quite fast on that optimized kernel that Free has built. I imagine a 64bit chuck would be nothing short of amazing.

-mike

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Oliver Oli wrote: > this is really sad news for me. i just tried to compile chuck on 64studio. > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Kassen wrote: >> Dear list (and devs/ admins), >> >> The ChucK download page ( http://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/release/ ) doesn't >> mention that on Linux ChucK requires a 32 bit system (and not 64, right >> now). >> >> I strongly suspect this to be the cause of confusion/segfaulting here; >> http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26414 >> >> (though I may be wrong) >> >> I would recommend putting this "on the packaging" so we can go on to new and >> innovative ways of seg-faulting and being confused. >> >> In case I'm wrong; do we have a Fedora-expert who might be able to help >> Flies there? >> >> Yours, >> Kas. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> chuck-users mailing list >> chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu >> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > chuck-users mailing list > chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users >

-- http://semiotech.org

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users