[chuck-users] performance under linux

Atte André Jensen atte.jensen at gmail.com
Sat Dec 17 04:40:58 EST 2005

Ge Wang wrote:

>     > chuck --bufsize128 foo.ck

That would translate to 1/44100 * 2 (stereo) * 2 (16 bit is two bytes) * 
128 = 11,6 ms of latency, right?

> Try different powers of two to hopefully find a good balance between 
> latency and stability.

That works great. Chorus still seems to be quite hungry. One aspect I 
still need to try out is using a single one and not two Chorus'es since 
it's now stereo as far as I unerstand. An even better way would be to 
direct all voices through the same Chorus, although I haven't tried that 

peace, love & harmony


More information about the chuck-users mailing list