[chuck-users] performance under linux
Atte André Jensen
atte.jensen at gmail.com
Sat Dec 17 04:40:58 EST 2005
Ge Wang wrote:
> > chuck --bufsize128 foo.ck
That would translate to 1/44100 * 2 (stereo) * 2 (16 bit is two bytes) *
128 = 11,6 ms of latency, right?
> Try different powers of two to hopefully find a good balance between
> latency and stability.
That works great. Chorus still seems to be quite hungry. One aspect I
still need to try out is using a single one and not two Chorus'es since
it's now stereo as far as I unerstand. An even better way would be to
direct all voices through the same Chorus, although I haven't tried that
peace, love & harmony
More information about the chuck-users