[chuck-users] Is ChucK still developped ?

[Lucas Samaruga]

I want to encourage their development as well.
ChucK has something that no other environment has, the ability to jump from
one level to another without time constraints of architecture. Which I find
very interesting.
Regards
Lucas

2010/5/5 Ge Wang <ge at ccrma.stanford.edu>

> Greetings Thomas!
>
> Thanks for the encouraging feedback!  ChucK is definitely alive, kicking,
> crashing, and growing!  We need to restructure our dev process to be better,
> but we are as committed as ever.
>
> Keep on ChucKin'!
>
> Ge!
>
> ~~~
> Ge Wang
> Assistant Professor
> Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA)
> Stanford University
> http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~ge/
> ~
> Co-founder, CTO, Chief Creative Officer
> Smule
> http://www.smule.com/ | http://twitter.com/gewang
> ~~~
>
>
> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Thomas Girod wrote:
>
>  Hi there.
>>
>> I'm currently making a small app using ChucK, and I find this language
>> marvelous - truly, I find it much easier to get things done with ChucK
>> than with SuperCollider.
>>
>> But at the same time, it's pretty obvious that the language still have
>> a few caveats, stuff that is not implemented yet. Looking at the dev
>> list, I can see there isn't much activity around this project anymore.
>>
>> So, is the project dying ?
>>
>> T
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20100505/8a23eb22/attachment.htm>