[chuck-users] 1.3.1 not happy with my jack (64-bit)

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On 09/10/2012 06:13 AM, Kassen wrote:
> Now we just need to hope that call is available in the same form for
> all editions of Jack ;-)

All jacks are api compatible AFAIK... if not it is a bug...

I agree that chuck should complain at least, and not fail silently. It 
might depend on how rt-audio handles this (maybe there is an error 
return being ignored?)

-- Fernando

>If not I would lean towards requiring Jackd2,
> which is far more generous in what it accepts from clients, good for
> clients prone to experimentation.
>
> I did some development on connecting to Jack, but not too much and
> will defer to a actual expert if we have one.