- chuck-users - lists.cs.princeton.edu

what is Gluck?
by lucas samaruga 15 Sep '08

15 Sep '08

Hola a todos I have two questions. Somebody knows what is about Gluck (Ogl api)? Is something like fluxus or is for a GUI use within audicle? BTW: Fluxus like ChucK is a great project!!! www.pawfal.org BTW2: An unified language approach would be surely better, (a time based approach) *1. Inventor: I think it can be good for your multimedia projects (fluxus can manage and RECORD OSC events). Cheers Lucas *1 PS: Ok, I'm musician, I have my preferences.

6 11

setting static data at construction (bug)
by Kassen 11 Sep '08

11 Sep '08

Fellow ChucKists, I believe this to be a bug; ------------------------------------------------------- class foo { 3 => static int bar; } <<<foo.bar>>>; ---------------------------------------- For float, int and dur making members static prevents them being set to a default value at construction, instead they are defaulting to 0 (or 0::ms). I ran into this with dur, where it's obviously dangerous to make this mistake. Of course these constructs would (probably?) mean that initialising any instance of such a class would mean resetting the value for all instancesbut I'm dealing with classes that exclusively have static members and not intending to make any specific instances of them. Clearly this is easy to get around but I still feel it's a bug. Yours, Kas.

5 13

ProcessPP + STK = ChucK on steroids?
by Stephen Sinclair 11 Sep '08

11 Sep '08

This was posted on the LAD mailing list: http://tapas.affenbande.org/wordpress/?page_id=91 It's a "livecoding" environment for making music with C++. I bet if you combined it with STK you could get something like ChucK. :) (but, *shudder*, C++... can't stand it more and more these days) Steve

2 2

Re: [chuck-users] emacs, and other editors for chuck
by ynohtna 10 Sep '08

10 Sep '08

Yay, lots of Emacs users! I'm currently, in my spare time, looking into integrating Emacs with ChucK to streamline (live) coding and experimentation. I have recently prototyped an Emacs minor mode that supports real-time text-mode sequencing (sending arbitrary OSC messages via realtime modified Emacs Lisp code) and have been hacking Emacs on and off since the early 90s. So, if anyone wants to express their needs for such a thing I'd be happy to consider converting them into implementable features. No promises, though, as my daylight job often consumes all my computer-centric energy. So far, I have determined a wish list including syntax highlighting, "intellisense" style completion, mode-line representation of ChucK's status, automatic shred/spork replacement, and minibuffer display of micro-documentation for classes/functions/syntax under the point. Any other input is welcome. Anthony. (Sometimes short bearded, often stubbled, no sandals)

4 3

library additions
by Kassen 10 Sep '08

10 Sep '08

I added a section on MIDI and a link to Bruce Murphy's MIDI sender code. I'd prefer to have that code on the WIKI as well and perhaps merge it with Antimon/Stefan's work on MIDI clock out as that fills the largest hole there (see http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=161799#161799 ), but it's not my code. Yours, Kas.

1 0

emacs, and other editors for chuck
by Stephen Sinclair 09 Sep '08

09 Sep '08

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Kassen <signal.automatique(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Stephen Sinclair; > >> I don't use it (emacs ftw!) > > Would you have the time to share some of your thoughts on the advantages of > emacs for ChucKing? I looked at it but it's quite a daunting editor and I'd > like to know a bit about the potential gains before investing time in it. Hm, let's see. _mainly_ I use emacs because i'm used to it. I use it for coding, and my fingers know the shortcuts, and it just works for me. I've tried to get used to vim, for example, and just can't seem to do it. This goes for any editor, of course: use what you know, and what you like. I'm not on any mission to make people use specific software, I can't only make recommendations. However, there are some virtues, I think that deserve mention. (Some of these will of course be available in other programs.) One, is that emacs has "windows". You can drop a shell into one window, an editor into another, and a status window into a third. You can split the screen in any desireable way. Two, is that I have F6 configured for "compile", which gives me a one-liner shell command, and F7 for "recompile", which just repeats whatever the last compile command was. This is insanely useful for chucking, because you can hit F6 and tell chuck to load your script, and then take note of which shred ID it got, and use the '=' command to replace it the next time. Then just edit and keep hitting F7. On top of that, emacs has really good search & replace and regexp support. (I use the former more than the latter.) Which I have configured to Ctrl-A on my keyboard so that's a really fast thing to do. Then I can switch between files by hitting Ctrl-B and typing the first few letters of the file name and then Tab (if i've loaded it already) or load or create a new file with Ctrl-F. The filename completion rocks. Lastly, it's completely programmable with lisp. So if I wanted I could probably make it way more intelligently communicate with ChucK, interpreting its error messages among other things. But I don't have the patience for that. :) One thing that I sorely miss is the ability to automatically track which shred IDs get assigned to which files, for when I want to remove or replace a shred. However I think this is also partly the fault of ChucK which can't be bothered to tell me this information in a useful way, since it doesn't differentiate between files and sporks. But I'd love to be able to remove or replace a shred by *name* instead of by some number that I have to look way back in the buffer to find. (But of course Ctrl-S-S "search" is pretty quick for this.) All in all I don't have to take my hand off the keyboard, which is particularly nice. As for it being a daunting editor, I really only use a handful of commands, though of course it's capable of much more. > >> >> but I just tried to compile it quickly and >> it failed, so I can't help directly. > > Hmmm. I found the Mini quite easy to compile, at least since there is a > clear list of all that you need for it, on top of ChucK's dependencies. Yeah I don't know why it didn't work. But I haven't taken the time to figure it out. Probably something small. > I just wish it would have a more intelligent "replace" function for shreds > then always replacing the last one that was run. It's nice and simple, I > like that. There are hotkeys for running code though not enough for editing > it. emacs will solve all of those issues, I'm sure but that would go at the > expense of the simplicity? I'd love to program some emacs lisp, or some other mechanism, to track which shreds have been loaded. Something that would give super-quick keyboard access to remove or replace specific shreds. Perhaps Tab completion would be good for this. By the way, with all this talk about emacs, I should really specify, honestly, that I really only have a very short beard. And no, I don't wear sandles. ;-) cheers, Steve

3 3

paper trail
by Kassen 09 Sep '08

09 Sep '08

Fellow ChucKists, Does anybody know what my options are in printing (to paper, the old-fashioned way) from the Mini under (Ubuntu) Linux? Ideally I'd like to periodically or on command print edit buffers to paper as text as part of a performance. Is this possible at all? Yours, Kas.

4 5

Re: [chuck-users] Reconnecting Ugens (was; determining type)
by Tiemen Meerman 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

Kassen, (Long time no speak, btw!) > What if we'd wish-list two new member functions for UGen's, similar to the new "UGen.isConnectedTo( Ugen )"? I'm imagining "isConnectedTo()" and ".connectsTo()", both of which would return a array of type Ugen (that could obviously be of length 0). Fully agree! Introspection of this kind is a must in my opinion! The possibilities would be endless and I don't see why the scope should be limited - access to the entire graph from anywhere should be possible and makes for a much simpler implementation. I am uncertain whether the instanceof operator/function was ever implemented, but that would be equally essential. While wish-listing (and slightly related) a cool feature would be a way of tagging UGens with a arbitrary string. This would give us a way of providing a unique AND meaningful identifier to a UGen. Useful while traversing complicated graphs. > I am starting to think that this kind of wrapping, for what sounds like it could also be seen as a very general and atomic operation, is a bit much; to get the extra feature of reconfiguring the UGen graph we'd have to sacrifice the ChucK operator as it applies to UGen's. I like the ChucK operator, too, but wish it was overloadable by the user - this would allow us a hook to do a lot of things! (I will not even try to list them ;) Have been away from my computer for too long, and wish ChucK ran on BlackBerries! -T

2 1

Re: [chuck-users] Reconnecting Ugens (was; determining type)
by Kassen 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

Tiemen; > That sounds like the correct behaviour, as you only change the memory > address 'patchpoint' is pointing to. The actual graph will know nothing of > this event. > Ok. Learned another thing. I suppose I took the word "assignment" too literally. Thanks! > > This method adds yet another wrapper around the UGens, but might be worth > it for the flexibility it provides. > Yes, could be interesting and worthwhile for specific applications like perhaps a configurable multi FX. I am starting to think that this kind of wrapping, for what sounds like it could also be seen as a very general and atomic operation, is a bit much; to get the extra feature of reconfiguring the UGen graph we'd have to sacrifice the ChucK operator as it applies to UGen's. What if we'd wish-list two new member functions for UGen's, similar to the new "UGen.isConnectedTo( Ugen )"? I'm imagining "isConnectedTo()" and ".connectsTo()", both of which would return a array of type Ugen (that could obviously be of length 0). This would enable us to write something like; ========================================= fun void replace (UGen target, UGen replacement) { while(target.isConnectedTo().cap() ) { target.isConnectedTo()[0] => replacement; target.isConnectedTo()[0] =< target; } while (target.connectsTo().cap() { replacement => target.connectsTo()[0]; target =< target.connectsTo()[0]; } } ======================== To me this sounds more general then the new "UGen.isConnectedTo( Ugen )" function from the latest version which could be re-written in terms of my modest proposal while the reverse isn't true. Am I making sense here? It's not that I don't see the use of wrapping Ugens to gain some domain specific functionality and it's great that we can, but reconfiguring the UGen graph sounds to me like a very general type of functionality that may be desirable as a part of the language. There are, of course, namespace issues here. Using these and starting from the DAC we could map the complete (active) UGen Graph while this should be limited to the UGens that are reachable from the current namespace. I'm not sure how feasible this is right now; clearly all of the knowledge we need is there in the system but that need not mean it's easily reachable, seeing as how the UGen graph is relatively independent from the code. Apologies for jumping from topic to topic like that; little sleep meant a bit of a heightened associativity for me. :¬) Yours, Kas.

1 0

Re: [chuck-users] determining the type of an Object in code
by Tiemen Meerman 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

Hmmm, after testing I found that sadly the following will run (without errors) but won't "fly"; =============== SawOsc s => UGen patchpoint => dac; second => now; new LPF @=> patchpoint; second => now; ======================== It seems that asignment to a UGen doesn't affect the Ugen-graph? That sounds like the correct behaviour, as you only change the memory address 'patchpoint' is pointing to. The actual graph will know nothing of this event. I was thinking of a class that achieves what you are aiming for: UGenRepatch - usage would look like: UGenRepatch repatch; repatch.ugen(LPF lpf); repatch.addIn(SawOsc osc); repatch.addOut(dac); To setup the basic graph. After this you could repatch by saying: repatch.ugen(HPF hpf); Internally it would then unchuck the old LPF and place the HPF in the middle. Obviously you could also write functions to remove/replace Ins or Outs from the central UGen. This method adds yet another wrapper around the UGens, but might be worth it for the flexibility it provides. -Tiemen

1 0