- ixp1200 - lists.cs.princeton.edu

Vera Software update
by Yitzchak M. Gottlieb 25 Mar '02

25 Mar '02

We are very happy to announce an update of the VERA Runtime libraries and the Vera IXPRouter library. This is mostly a minor update to correct small problems in compiling and using the IXPRouter library. Some relevant changes include: 1) Instructions on using WINE to compile microassembly code. 2) An enhanced user interface for the router 3) Various small bug fixes. The software is available at http://www.cs.princeton.edu/nsg/vera. Please feel free to post any questions. Zuki (for Scott Karlin and Wen Xu) -- Yitzchak Gottlieb zuki(a)CS.Princeton.EDU

2 5

L3Fwd2f project.....
by ravi modgekar 23 Mar '02

23 Mar '02

hi, I was trying to run the L3FWD2F project on the Eval board which has 16 10/100 ports and 2 gig ports.But I couldnt make it work. I have tried using the ixf1002 both in external loopback mode and internal loopback mode.I was using the peth driver compiled for ixf1002 to generate icmp packets. Did I miss something while configuring?? Does the PETH driver set up mac address for ixf1002? If anybody has tried this please help me out. Thanks and Regards Ravi __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards� http://movies.yahoo.com/

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] packet to strong arm
by Johnson, Erik J 20 Mar '02

20 Mar '02

> My question is... > 1)Is there any major modification to be done in the > code to run a project written for a 64 bit > bidirectional IXbus mode to make it run on 32 bit > unidirectional IXBus mode?? >From a software perspective, no. That is, you don't need to change the receive or transmit microcode. The hardware must agree upon the format (i.e., the MAC and IXP1200 must both be using the same mode) > 2)what exactly is the communicaton mechanism between > the microengines and the core?What I have understood > is that the receive thread creates a descriptor which > contains info about which port to send the packet > to,and then the transmit thread reads this descriptor > and transmits the packet to the specified port.But in > this case the port number is 18,then how does trasmit > thread make use of this port 18.Please correct me if I > am wrong. In the reference designs, port 18 is not handled by the transmit microengines. Rather, when the ingress code enqueues a descriptor on port 18, the PETH driver (or any other software you want) running in the core dequeues the descriptor and hands it (usually) to the IP stack of the OS. When the core needs to transmit a packet, it directly enqueues on the transmit queue for the outgoing port. Note that a similar model is taken by the microblocks/microACE model in IXA SDK 2.0, but the actual implementation is a bit different. In this model there are also queues between the microengines and core, but these queues avoid core/microengine locks and there are APIs for demultiplexing the packets on either side of the queues to the appropriate piece of core or microengine code. > > Thanks and regards > Ravi Modgekar > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage > http://sports.yahoo.com/ >

1 0

packet to strong arm
by ravi modgekar 20 Mar '02

20 Mar '02

hi, I am new to ixp1200...I am facing a problem understanding how the microengines transfer packets to the strong arm. I am working on a project using IXP1250 which has an IXF1002 connected .Now I am using L3Fwd2F reference project as my base project to write code for this board. My question is... 1)Is there any major modification to be done in the code to run a project written for a 64 bit bidirectional IXbus mode to make it run on 32 bit unidirectional IXBus mode?? 2)what exactly is the communicaton mechanism between the microengines and the core?What I have understood is that the receive thread creates a descriptor which contains info about which port to send the packet to,and then the transmit thread reads this descriptor and transmits the packet to the specified port.But in this case the port number is 18,then how does trasmit thread make use of this port 18.Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks and regards Ravi Modgekar __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/

1 0

Shared memory on IXP:
by Ashley Thomas 20 Mar '02

20 Mar '02

hi all, Has anyone used shared memory on IXP ? We tried a simple program which ran fine on ilab m/c but gave this error on ixp (after X-compilation of course with mbig-endian) Failed:: Invalid argument this was the program: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/shm.h> #include <sys/stat.h> main() { int segment_id; char * shared_memory; int segment_size; const int shared_segment_size = 0x6400; if( (segment_id = shmget(1234,shared_segment_size,IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL|S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR) ) < 0) { perror("Failed:"); exit(0); } printf("Id - %d\n",segment_id); shmctl(segment_id,IPC_RMID,0); } -ashley -Ashley Thomas (athomas(a)cc.gatech.edu)

2 1

Netbind Source Code Release for IXP 1200 Network Processor based Routers
by Michael Kounavis 19 Mar '02

19 Mar '02

NetBind is a binding tool that supports the dynamic creation of component based data paths and virtual routers in network processor-based routers. Source code is available from: http://comet.columbia.edu/genesis/netbind/ NetBind balances the flexibility of network programmability against the need to process and forward packets at line speeds in routers. While the design of NetBind is generic, the current implementation of the tool is focused toward the Intel IXP1200 network processor. The following source code, utilities and services are available: + a binding tool (NetBind) for constructing data paths and virtual routers in network processor-based routers; + a programming language and interpreter (ni) for profiling modular data paths; + a modular IPv4 protocol stack (IPpath) and a suite of test programs that create the stack dynamically; + a set of IXP1200 microassembler extensions (uof2tmd) for creating the components of modular data paths. + remote access to Columbia's Virtual Network Testbed for experimenting with NetBind. For a paper on NetBind see: http://www.comet.columbia.edu/genesis/papers/openarch02_netbind.pdf "NetBind: A Binding Tool for Constructing Data Paths in Network Processor-based Routers" by Andrew T. Campbell, Stephen Chou, Michael E. Kounavis, Vassilis D. Stachtos and John B. Vicente, IEEE Fifth International Conference on Open Architectures and Network Programming (OPENARCH' 02), June 2002. Thanks, Genesis Team NetBind Software was developed by the Genesis Project, which is sponsored by the NSF and with support from the Intel Research Council, Hitachi and Nortel Networks. Copyright (C) Comet Group in Columbia University, 2001

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] restoring flash memory contents on the ixp1200
by Varnell, Frank 15 Mar '02

15 Mar '02

dataman has a reasonably cheap yet good device programmer. They do have a tsop adapter. http://www.dataman.com/ -f -----Original Message----- From: Loren Card [mailto:lcard@ee.umanitoba.ca] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:05 AM To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: Re: [ixp1200] restoring flash memory contents on the ixp1200 I also have this problem. Commercial Device Programmers and TSOP adapters are mighty expensive. Does anyone know of a cheap solution? (Perhaps a simple DIY device programmer? Does anyone know where to get a TSOP socket adapter for cheap?) Can anyone offer access to their equipment? Loren Card, 7th Year Engineering Student, Medium-Sized Meanie, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba, LCard(a)ee.umanitoba.ca On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Dinesh Yaji wrote: > Hello all, > > The flash memory on my ixp1200 accidentally got overwritten. > How can I restore the boot manager onto the flash memory? > > thanks, > > Dinesh. > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > >

1 0

restoring flash memory contents on the ixp1200
by Dinesh Yaji 15 Mar '02

15 Mar '02

Hello all, The flash memory on my ixp1200 accidentally got overwritten. How can I restore the boot manager onto the flash memory? thanks, Dinesh. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

2 1

Re: [ixp1200] Re: unable to generate vera.o loadable module
by Rayashish＠aol.com 12 Mar '02

12 Mar '02

RHL 7.2, kernel - 2.4.16 --Ashish

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] Future micro-ace support on KEIXP12EBAB ??
by Preston, Charles E 12 Mar '02

12 Mar '02

Unfortunately, there's no plan to do this. The K3IXP12EBAB system just doesn't have enough memory to support the ACE infrastructure. Regards, Carlo -----Original Message----- From: Didier CONTIS [mailto:didier@ece.gatech.edu] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:05 PM To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: [ixp1200] Future micro-ace support on KEIXP12EBAB ?? I know Dirk posted the following info on 12/12/2001: > Be aware that SDK 2.0 does not support KEIXP12EBAB. All the tools may be > used to develop code but the micro-ace infrastructure will not run. I was wondering if there is any plan to one day support the ACE infrastucture of this development board ? (We have not received SDK 2.01 yet - so I was unable to check the docs). Thanks in advance, Regards - Didier.

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] Future micro-ace support on KEIXP12EBAB ??
by Brandewie, Dirk J 12 Mar '02

12 Mar '02

There are no plans to support the ACE infrastructure on the KEIXP12EBAB. Sorry --Dirk > -----Original Message----- > From: Didier CONTIS [mailto:didier@ece.gatech.edu] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:05 PM > To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU > Subject: [ixp1200] Future micro-ace support on KEIXP12EBAB ?? > > > > I know Dirk posted the following info on 12/12/2001: > > > Be aware that SDK 2.0 does not support KEIXP12EBAB. All > the tools may be > > used to develop code but the micro-ace infrastructure will not run. > > > I was wondering if there is any plan to one day support the ACE > infrastucture of this development board ? (We have not > received SDK 2.01 > yet - so I was unable to check the docs). > > Thanks in advance, > > Regards - Didier. >

1 0

unable to generate vera.o loadable module
by Rayashish＠aol.com 12 Mar '02

12 Mar '02

Hello, I got the following error when I tried to generate the vera.o loadable kernel module. I wan unable to build the module against the currently running kernel. [root@x130-65-157-198 driver]# make nodes Updating dependency makefile kpci_util.d from kpci_util.c In file included from /usr/include/linux/module.h:21, from kpci_util.c:21: /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:1:2: #error Modules should never use kernel-headers system headers, /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:2:2: #error but rather headers from an appropriate kernel-source package. /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:3:2: #error Change -I/usr/src/linux/include (or similar) to /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:4:2: #error -I/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/include /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:5:2: #error to build against the currently-running kernel. Updating dependency makefile drvVera.d from drvVera.c In file included from /usr/include/linux/module.h:21, from drvVera.c:59: /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:1:2: #error Modules should never use kernel-headers system headers, /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:2:2: #error but rather headers from an appropriate kernel-source package. /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:3:2: #error Change -I/usr/src/linux/include (or similar) to /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:4:2: #error -I/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/include /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:5:2: #error to build against the currently-running kernel. In file included from drvVera.c:70: /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:1:2: #error Modules should never use kernel-headers system headers, /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:2:2: #error but rather headers from an appropriate kernel-source package. /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:3:2: #error Change -I/usr/src/linux/include (or similar) to /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:4:2: #error -I/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/include /usr/include/linux/modversions.h:5:2: #error to build against the currently-running kernel. Can anyone tell me how to build the module against the currently running kernel? help! -Ashish.

2 1

RE: [ixp1200] Cost of developping with KEIXP12EBAB
by Brandewie, Dirk J 11 Mar '02

11 Mar '02

Hi Loren, > Will the KEIXP12EBAB kits (which I am told include C0 Silicon) run ARM > Linux out of the box? (The SDK 2.0 documentation centers around the > development platform with the WinNT SBC, but states that you > dont need to > use the WinNT SBC, if you have your own workstation. This > seems to imply > that I should not have any trouble loading Linux on the evaluation kit > too, so long as I have a WinNT workstation.) The KEIXP12EBAB kits will run Linux out of the box you can find the distribution at ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/u/urnaik/. Be aware that SDK 2.0 does not support KEIXP12EBAB. All the tools may be used to develop code but the micro-ace infrastructure will not run. > > Does anyone know how much Intel wants for the Microengine C Compiler? > We are in the process of arranging special education pricing but don't have a final answer yet stay tuned. > What other tools are required that I don't know about? Not a required tool but another environment that runs on the eval system is available at http://www.cs.princeton.edu/nsg/vera/ > > Can you develop on the evaluation kit using only free software tools? Yes you can do all your development with the tools from the SDK and the GCC that is part of the Linux distribution. --Dirk

3 2

RE: [ixp1200] where to get IXP evaluation board ?
by Brandewie, Dirk J 07 Mar '02

07 Mar '02

Hi All Arrow electronics is a stocking distributor for the Radisys ENP2505 you might want to talk to them if you only need one or two boards. --Dirk > -----Original Message----- > From: Ibieta, Rod [mailto:rod.ibieta@intel.com] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:13 AM > To: 'ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU' > Subject: RE: [ixp1200] where to get IXP evaluation board ? > > > Kostas: > Contact Radisys at www.radisys.com > > They should be able to help you. The board you're looking for > is likely the > ENP 2505. > Rod Ibieta > IXA University Programs > Network Processor Division > Intel Communications Group > Intel Corporation > (480) 554-3692 > Pager (888) 463-4852 > E-mail my pager by sending a message with the word "pager" in > the subject > line > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostas G. Anagnostakis [mailto:anagnost@dsl.cis.upenn.edu] > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 1:05 PM > To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU > Subject: [ixp1200] where to get IXP evaluation board ? > > > > Hi all, > > Apologies if the question is inappropriate for this list. > > We have been trying to find a distributor willing to sell us a single > evaluation board to us, through the list available on the > Intel Web site, > but without any success so far. Intel customer service could > only point to > that list, so that didn't help either. > > Does any of the university users on this list have any hints > to give us on > this ? > > thanks, > > --kostas >

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] (no subject)
by Ranjeeta 06 Mar '02

06 Mar '02

Hi, Try this: During RedHat 7.2 installation, choose "Firewall Configuration" as "No Firewall" Rationale: Initially I had chosen "Medium" for Firewall Configuration. In the Red Hat documentation, I read that, in this case your firewall will not allow access to certain resources on your system. By default, access to these resources are not allowed- · Ports lower than 1023 - the standard reserved ports, used by most system services, such as FTP, SSH, telnet and HTTP {Note: TFTP uses port 69} · The NFS server port (2049) <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> So, I finally decided to do a fresh installation choosing "No Firewall" I am sure then your TFTP server will work as desired. -Ranjeeta -----Original Message----- From: Rayashish(a)aol.com [mailto:Rayashish@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:52 AM To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: Re: [ixp1200] (no subject) no, it is workstation installation. --Ashish

3 3

gdb endian-ness problem
by Sundar Ramachandran 06 Mar '02

06 Mar '02

Hello people, I'd recompiled gdb with the arm toolchain and modified its makefile with the -mbig-endian option ('cos the gdb binary provided at netwinder.org does not work on Debian!). When I run gdb remotely with an armv4b-compiled-and-linked program executable, the target is recognized as armv4b-unknown-linux but I get a warning that the big-endian file did not match the little-endian target. What am I missing here? Do I need to include options for the linker (-EB option) anywhere in the makefile to convince gdb that the specified target is big-endian? Can I just ignore this warning and carry on? Any feedback is appreciated. Thank you for your time. - Sundar.

1 0

Re: [ixp1200] (no subject)
by Rayashish＠aol.com 05 Mar '02

05 Mar '02

no, it is workstation installation. --Ashish

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] (no subject)
by Ranjeeta 05 Mar '02

05 Mar '02

Hi, When you installed RH 7.2 on host, did you choose "Server Installation"? -Ranjeeta -----Original Message----- From: Rayashish(a)aol.com [mailto:Rayashish@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:35 AM To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: Re: [ixp1200] (no subject) Hi Ranjeeta, Everything is setup as you 've explained. Cygmon is running on IXP-box. Now it supposed to boot the linux os from the host computer through tftp. tftp running on host computer gets the request to transfer file 'zImage', sends first block and then waits for ack, but it does not get the ack from ixp-box. could you figure out what may be the problem. regards, Ashish

1 0

Re: [ixp1200] (no subject)
by Rayashish＠aol.com 05 Mar '02

05 Mar '02

Hi Ranjeeta, Everything is setup as you 've explained. Cygmon is running on IXP-box. Now it supposed to boot the linux os from the host computer through tftp. tftp running on host computer gets the request to transfer file 'zImage', sends first block and then waits for ack, but it does not get the ack from ixp-box. could you figure out what may be the problem. regards, Ashish

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] Tornado 2.1 with IXP1200 SDK 2.0
by john_zhou＠nai.com 05 Mar '02

05 Mar '02

It seems you have to use Tornado 2.0 to build it. John -----Original Message----- From: Griffin, Chris [mailto:CGriffin@visualnetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:15 AM To: 'ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU' Subject: [ixp1200] Tornado 2.1 with IXP1200 SDK 2.0 Hi, Has anyone tried building the VxWorksNetapp.o or the CoreLibs using the Tornado 2.1 package? I'm using the IXP1200 SDK 2.0 and I'm wondering if the SDK 2.01 will improve things or if I need to hack up the Intel files myself. Thanks! --Chris Griffin Embedded Software Engineer Visual Networks, Inc. cgriffin(a)visualnetworks.com phone: 301-296-2644 fax: 301-296-2303

1 0

Tornado 2.1 with IXP1200 SDK 2.0
by Griffin, Chris 05 Mar '02

05 Mar '02

Hi, Has anyone tried building the VxWorksNetapp.o or the CoreLibs using the Tornado 2.1 package? I'm using the IXP1200 SDK 2.0 and I'm wondering if the SDK 2.01 will improve things or if I need to hack up the Intel files myself. Thanks! --Chris Griffin Embedded Software Engineer Visual Networks, Inc. cgriffin(a)visualnetworks.com phone: 301-296-2644 fax: 301-296-2303

1 0

RE: [ixp1200] (no subject)
by Ranjeeta 04 Mar '02

04 Mar '02

Hi, Here are the steps: 1. Install tftp-0.17-14 and tftp-server-0.17-14 packages from Red Hat 7.2 CD 2 2. Create tftpboot directory under /tftpboot and copy zImage and ramdisk_img.gz under /tftpboot/tftpboot. OR You can change tftp file as outlined in step 5 to take server_args as -s /. In this case, you need not make subdirectory under /tftpboot. 3. chmod 777 /tftpboot/tftpboot/* Or Chmod 777 /tftpboot/* 4. Under /etc/xinetd.d, there is a file called "tftp". Update it to look like this: service tftp { socket_type = dgram protocol = udp wait = yes user = root port = 69 server = /usr/sbin/in.tftpd server_args = -s /tftpboot disable = no } Or if you choose to use /tftpboot directory for getting zImage and ramdisk image, update tftp file as shown below: service tftp { socket_type = dgram protocol = udp wait = yes user = root port = 69 server = /usr/sbin/in.tftpd server_args = -s / disable = no } 5. ps aux | grep xinetd Once you get the pid, kill it kill -9 pid Run xinetd again For getting NFS server to work ================================== Check if nfs-utils-0.3.1-12 package is installed rpm -qa | grep nfs* Install the package nfs-utils-0.3.1-12 if it is not installed. Edit the file /etc/exports IP-address-of-host:/nfsdir *(rw) Then type "exportfs -a" Hope it helps.... -Ranjeeta -----Original Message----- From: Sundararaman Shiva [mailto:shiva_ixp1200@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:27 PM To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: RE: [ixp1200] (no subject) Hi Ranjeeta, Could you briefly outline the steps for running tftp and nfs for RH7.2 We have been trying it for quite some time. Thanks, shiva --- Ranjeeta <ranjeeta(a)intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > You can use RH 7.2 for IXA SDK but setting up of > TFTP server and NFS server > requires a little different steps than what is > documented in the > installation guide. > > -Ranjeeta > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rayashish(a)aol.com [mailto:Rayashish@aol.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 1:04 PM > To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU > Subject: Re: [ixp1200] (no subject) > > > In a message dated 3/2/02 11:57:20 AM Pacific > Standard Time, > abhijeet(a)cs.utah.edu writes: > > I am trying to setup the development environment for > IXP 1200 EE board. I > 've > gone through the document, which says: > > There are two software development environments > designed specifically for > IXA > application developers. > 1. The IXA SDK to develop IXA applications and to > write code modules > targeted for the IXDP1200 Advanced Development > Platform. > The IXA SDK runs on Red Hat Linux * 6.2 or Cygwin > * (under Windows NT * ) > > and is available on the IXA SDK distribution CD > 1. > > 2. The IXP1200 Microengine Development Environment > to write microcode > modules (including those for microACEs) targeted > for microengines on the > IXP1200. > The IXP1200 Microengine Development Environment > runsWindows NT-4 > > I want to know if i can use RHL 7.2 for IXA SDK and > Windows 2000 Pro > for IXP1200 Microengine Development Environmen. Is > it necessary to stick > with > RHL 6.2 and WinNT-4? > > Regards, > Ashish > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball http://sports.yahoo.com

2 1

RE: [ixp1200] (no subject)
by Ranjeeta 04 Mar '02

04 Mar '02

Hi, You can use RH 7.2 for IXA SDK but setting up of TFTP server and NFS server requires a little different steps than what is documented in the installation guide. -Ranjeeta -----Original Message----- From: Rayashish(a)aol.com [mailto:Rayashish@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 1:04 PM To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: Re: [ixp1200] (no subject) In a message dated 3/2/02 11:57:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, abhijeet(a)cs.utah.edu writes: I am trying to setup the development environment for IXP 1200 EE board. I 've gone through the document, which says: There are two software development environments designed specifically for IXA application developers. 1. The IXA SDK to develop IXA applications and to write code modules targeted for the IXDP1200 Advanced Development Platform. The IXA SDK runs on Red Hat Linux * 6.2 or Cygwin * (under Windows NT * ) and is available on the IXA SDK distribution CD 1. 2. The IXP1200 Microengine Development Environment to write microcode modules (including those for microACEs) targeted for microengines on the IXP1200. The IXP1200 Microengine Development Environment runsWindows NT-4 I want to know if i can use RHL 7.2 for IXA SDK and Windows 2000 Pro for IXP1200 Microengine Development Environmen. Is it necessary to stick with RHL 6.2 and WinNT-4? Regards, Ashish

2 1

RE: [ixp1200] where to get IXP evaluation board ?
by Ibieta, Rod 04 Mar '02

04 Mar '02

Kostas: Contact Radisys at www.radisys.com They should be able to help you. The board you're looking for is likely the ENP 2505. Rod Ibieta IXA University Programs Network Processor Division Intel Communications Group Intel Corporation (480) 554-3692 Pager (888) 463-4852 E-mail my pager by sending a message with the word "pager" in the subject line -----Original Message----- From: Kostas G. Anagnostakis [mailto:anagnost@dsl.cis.upenn.edu] Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 1:05 PM To: ixp1200(a)CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: [ixp1200] where to get IXP evaluation board ? Hi all, Apologies if the question is inappropriate for this list. We have been trying to find a distributor willing to sell us a single evaluation board to us, through the list available on the Intel Web site, but without any success so far. Intel customer service could only point to that list, so that didn't help either. Does any of the university users on this list have any hints to give us on this ? thanks, --kostas

1 0

Re: [ixp1200] (no subject)
by Rayashish＠aol.com 03 Mar '02

03 Mar '02

In a message dated 3/3/02 8:08:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, abhijeet(a)cs.utah.edu writes: > abhijeet > > thanks Abhijeet for helping me. i am gona install SDK 2 on LRH 7.2. --Ashish

1 0